• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

BioStartup Advice

  • Simulations
        • Simulations


        • BioStartup Advice: A Day in the Life
        • Stages of Starting a Biotech Business


        • Explore Motives & Skills Needed
        • Develop a Business Plan
        • Set Up Your Business
  • Topics
        • Topics


        • Exploring Entrepreneurship Possibilities:

        • Women Life Scientists as Entrepreneurs
        • Communication Skills for Women Scientists
        • Contemplating Entrepreneurship
        • Learning about Entrepreneurship:

        • Early Funding
        • Starting a Life Science Business
        • Basics of Intellectual Property
  • About
    • About BioStartup
    • About Us
    • Contact
  • Self-Check
  • Resources
    • Glossary
    • Blog
          • Topics:

          • Category:

          • Sort By:

          • Clear Filter
        • Resources | Tips | Case Examples
Home › Topics › Women Life Scientists as Entrepreneurs › Tackling Bias and Barriers for Women in Life Sciences and Business

Gender Disparities in Research Funding

Topics Women Life Scientists as Entrepreneurs Tackling Bias and Barriers for Women in Life Sciences and Business Gender Disparities in Research Funding
Take a Guess:

What percent of Small Innovative Business Research (SBIR) or Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) awards do you think go to women investigators across all agencies giving these awards (according to the NNWBC report, 2020)?

Select One
Around 15%
Around 25%
Around 35%
Around 45%

Correct: The National Women’s Business Council (FLC, 2020) reported that women accounted for 15% of Phase 1 SBIR proposals and about 14% of awards given out by all agencies. This has increased over the past 15 years (Liu & Parilla, 2016). The National Science Foundation experienced an even greater increase, going from 15.5% of Phase I SBIR awards for women-owned businesses in 2011 to 22.4% in 2018 (FLC, 2020).

Part of the reason for a still-low number of SBIR awards for women is a “leaky pipeline”, which sees progressively smaller numbers of women participating in science, engineering, and technology at each developmental stage from training to employment” (Martin et al., 2015). Some of the reasons for the “leak” are discussed in other articles in this section on Women Entrepreneurship.

Sources: FLC, 2020; Liu, 2016

It is actually fewer:

According to the 2020 report, around 15% of SBIR/STTR awards went to women-owned businesses, which is comparable to the percentage of applications from women-owned businesses (FLC, 2020). However, the numbers have increased since 2006:

Sources: FLC, 2020; Liu, 2016

It is actually fewer:

According to the 2020 report, around 15% of SBIR/STTR awards went to women-owned businesses, which is comparable to the percentage of applications from women-owned businesses (FLC, 2020). However, numbers have increased since 2006:

Sources: FLC, 2020; Liu, 2016

It is much fewer:

According to the 2020 report, around 15% of SBIR/STTR awards went to women-owned businesses, which is comparable to the percentage of applications from women-owned businesses (FLC, 2020). However, numbers have increased since 2006:

Sources: FLC, 2020; Liu, 2016

Quiz Sources

FLC. Report finds 15% of SBIR/STTR funds go to women-owned businesses | Federal Labs. Federal Laboratory Consortium. August 12, 2020.

Liu S & Parilla J. Is America’s Seed Fund investing in women- and minority-owned businesse? Brookings. June 4, 2016

Martin L, Wright L, Matlay H, Beaven Z. An Unusual Job for a Woman? Female Entrepreneurs in Scientific, Engineering and Technology Sectors. Int J Entrep Behav Res. May 21, 2015;21(4):539-556. doi:10.1108/IJEBR-08-2011-0095.

NIA. Women-Owned Small Business Federal Contracting Program

Evidence for Gender Disparities in Funding

  • A 2018 review found women received fewer than one-third of NIH research grants (Hechtman et al., 2018).
  • Women demonstrated research longevity on par with men after receiving their first NIH grants, contradicting a perception of a high attrition rate in this group (Hechtman et al., 2018).
  • A report by NWBC (2020) showed an improvement in the rate of SBIR/STTR funding for women from 8% in 2006 to around 14% of awards. This rate is similar to the rate of submission of proposals by women (15%).
  • Rissle et al. (2020) found that discrepancies in funding are mostly explained by discrepancies in grant submission rates. They proposed one reason for this is that fewer women focus on research as their primary work activity.
  • Female surgeons received fewer NIH awards than would be expected by their representation in the field, according to a review of 2019 funding. Those who did receive awards were granted less money on average, even when controlling for academic status (Hlavinka, 2020).
  • A summary of the evidence on gender inequality in grant peer reviews and the outcomes found both equality and inequality, and the evidence was inconclusive as to which predominated (Sato et al., 2020).

Sources

  • FLC. Report finds 15% of SBIR/STTR funds go to women-owned businesses | Federal Labs. Federal Laboratory Consortium. August 12, 2020.
  • Hechtman LA, Moore NP, Schulkey CE, et al. NIH Funding Longevity by Gender. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. July 31, 2018;115(31):7943-7948. doi:10.1073/pnas.1800615115. PMCID: PMC6077749. PMID: 30012615.
  • Hlavinka E. Female Surgeons Get Less NIH Funding Than Men. Medpage Today. December 9, 2020.
  • RissleR LJ, Hale KL, Joffe NR, Caruso NM. Gender Differences in Grant Submissions across Science and Engineering Fields at the NSF. Bioscience. July 29, 2020;70(9):814-820. doi:10.1093/biosci/biaa072. PMCID: PMC7498325. PMID: 32973410.
  • Sato S, Gygax PM, Randall J, Schmid Mast M. The Leaky Pipeline in Research Grant Peer Review and Funding Decisions: Challenges and Future Directions. High Educ (Dordr). October 3, 2020:1-18. doi:10.1007/s10734-020-00626-y. PMCID: PMC7532736. PMID: 33041361.

Resource
Women’s Inclusion in Small Business Innovation Research & Small Business Technology Transfer Programs. NWBC Report. August 2020.

Previous Article
Back to Sub-Topic
Next Article

Primary Sidebar

Topic Home Expand All
Overview
5 Articles
Few Women Start Life Science Businesses, but Numbers Are Growing
What Is a Women-Owned Business Certification? What Are the Benefits?
Case Example: Sasha Thomas, PhD and Entrepreneur
Groups Supporting Women in Science, Business, and Entrepreneurship
Business Success Stories from Women Life Scientists
Tackling Bias and Barriers for Women in Life Sciences and Business
5 Articles
Barriers, Bias, and Unfair Treatment
Gender Disparities in Research Funding
Countering Unfair Treatment
Ideas for Addressing Bias and Barriers
Discussion Group: Women Scientists on Barriers, Bias, and Unfair Treatment
Return to Women Life Scientists as Entrepreneurs

This project is funded by National Institute of General Medical Sciences (Grants 1R43 GM131458-01 & 2R GM131458-02)


  • Contact
  • Copyright & Reproduction Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Technology Requirements
  • 508 Compliance

Footer

a product of
Health Impact Studio
a division of Clinical Tools, Inc
  • Simulations
  • Contact
  • About
  • Blog
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
feedback@clinicaltools.com

101 A Market St Chapel Hill, NC 27516
919-960-8118

We're Hiring!

Join the Development Team!

© 2023 · Clinical Tools, Inc · Log in

Forgot Password?
Register New Account
Sign up for our Newsletter!

  • Hidden

Register

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
Consent

Login
Accessing this topic requires a login. Please enter your credentials below!

Lost Your Password?
Register
Don't have an account? Register one!
Register an Account

Registration confirmation will be emailed to you.